How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uruguay?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belgium

0.1228 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

0.1278 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belgium rank

3rd

Uruguay rank

2nd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Belgium
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.1278 kt per square kilometre against 0.1228 kt per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.005 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.1602 kt per square kilometre	0.1262 kt per square kilometre	0.034 kt per square kilometre	Belgium
2010s	0.1415 kt per square kilometre	0.1248 kt per square kilometre	0.0168 kt per square kilometre	Belgium
2020s	0.126 kt per square kilometre	0.1248 kt per square kilometre	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 0.1278 kt per square kilometre against 0.1228 kt per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Uruguay?: 0.005 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uruguay?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belgium ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/uruguay/">Belgium vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.