Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.008 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
0.0082 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
108th
Georgia rank
106th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Georgia
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0082 kt per square kilometre against 0.008 kt per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and Georgia ranks 106th of 167 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0089 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0.0097 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.0082 kt per square kilometre against 0.008 kt per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and Georgia ranks 106th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/georgia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.