Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Botswana
0.0023 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
0.0033 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Montenegro rank
138th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
0.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.007196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0033 kt per square kilometre against 0.0023 kt per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Botswana ranks 141st and Montenegro ranks 138th of 167 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0051 kt per square kilometre 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Botswana or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0.0033 kt per square kilometre against 0.0023 kt per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Botswana and Montenegro?
0.001 kt per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Botswana ranks 141st and Montenegro ranks 138th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/">Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.