Burkina Faso vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Burkina Faso
0.04 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0393 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
28th
Slovenia rank
30th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Slovenia
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.04 kt per square kilometre against 0.0393 kt per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0007 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 30th of 167 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0179 kt per square kilometre 0.0301 kt per square kilometre 0.0122 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0281 kt per square kilometre 0.0368 kt per square kilometre 0.0087 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0368 kt per square kilometre 0.0396 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0363 kt per square kilometre 0.0408 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Burkina Faso or Slovenia?
Burkina Faso, at 0.04 kt per square kilometre against 0.0393 kt per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Burkina Faso and Slovenia?
0.0007 kt per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Slovenia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Burkina Faso ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 30th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/slovenia/">Burkina Faso vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.