Canada vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Canada
0.0023 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0019 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
140th
Mauritania rank
143rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Canada
  • Mauritania
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0023 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Canada ranks 140th and Mauritania ranks 143rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Canada or Mauritania?
Canada, at 0.0023 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Canada and Mauritania?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Mauritania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Canada ranks 140th and Mauritania ranks 143rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/canada/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/canada/mauritania/">Canada vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.