Central African Republic vs Latvia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Central African Republic
0.0093 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0088 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
99th
Latvia rank
101st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Latvia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0093 kt per square kilometre against 0.0088 kt per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0005 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.013 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Central African Republic or Latvia?
Central African Republic, at 0.0093 kt per square kilometre against 0.0088 kt per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Central African Republic and Latvia?
0.0005 kt per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Central African Republic ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/">Central African Republic vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.