How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs North Macedonia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Chile

0.0065 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

North Macedonia

0.0061 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

115th

North Macedonia rank

117th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Chile
North Macedonia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0065 kt per square kilometre against 0.0061 kt per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Chile ranks 115th and North Macedonia ranks 117th of 167 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	North Macedonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0069 kt per square kilometre	0.0163 kt per square kilometre	0.0094 kt per square kilometre	North Macedonia
2000s	0.0085 kt per square kilometre	0.0134 kt per square kilometre	0.0049 kt per square kilometre	North Macedonia
2010s	0.0072 kt per square kilometre	0.0106 kt per square kilometre	0.0034 kt per square kilometre	North Macedonia
2020s	0.0067 kt per square kilometre	0.0069 kt per square kilometre	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Chile or North Macedonia?: Chile, at 0.0065 kt per square kilometre against 0.0061 kt per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Chile and North Macedonia?: 0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Chile ranks 115th and North Macedonia ranks 117th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs North Macedonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/north-macedonia/">Chile vs North Macedonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.