Chile vs Sweden: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Chile
0.0065 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0058 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
115th
Sweden rank
118th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Chile
  • Sweden
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0065 kt per square kilometre against 0.0058 kt per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0007 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Chile ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0077 kt per square kilometre 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0068 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Chile or Sweden?
Chile, at 0.0065 kt per square kilometre against 0.0058 kt per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Chile and Sweden?
0.0007 kt per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Chile ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.