Comoros vs Czechia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Comoros
0.0288 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia
0.0288 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
52nd
Czechia rank
53rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Comoros
  • Czechia
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.0288 kt per square kilometre against 0.0288 kt per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Comoros ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0264 kt per square kilometre 0.037 kt per square kilometre 0.0106 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 0.0279 kt per square kilometre 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 0.0281 kt per square kilometre 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 0.0288 kt per square kilometre 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Comoros or Czechia?
Comoros, at 0.0288 kt per square kilometre against 0.0288 kt per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Comoros and Czechia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Czechia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Comoros ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Czechia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/comoros/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/comoros/czechia/">Comoros vs Czechia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.