Congo vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Congo
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.0011 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
151st
Solomon Islands rank
152nd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Congo
  • Solomon Islands
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0011 kt per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Congo ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1970s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Solomon Islands?
Congo, at 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0011 kt per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Solomon Islands?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Congo ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/solomon-islands/">Congo vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.