Costa Rica vs Switzerland: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Costa Rica
0.0543 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
0.0557 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
19th
Switzerland rank
17th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Switzerland
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0.0557 kt per square kilometre against 0.0543 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0014 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 19th and Switzerland ranks 17th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Switzerland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0407 kt per square kilometre 0.0479 kt per square kilometre 0.0072 kt per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.0602 kt per square kilometre 0.059 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.078 kt per square kilometre 0.0606 kt per square kilometre 0.0174 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0555 kt per square kilometre 0.0551 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0245 kt per square kilometre 0.0524 kt per square kilometre 0.028 kt per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.0248 kt per square kilometre 0.0543 kt per square kilometre 0.0296 kt per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 0.0437 kt per square kilometre 0.0547 kt per square kilometre 0.011 kt per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Costa Rica or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 0.0557 kt per square kilometre against 0.0543 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Costa Rica and Switzerland?
0.0014 kt per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Switzerland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Switzerland ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Switzerland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/switzerland/">Costa Rica vs Switzerland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.