Cuba vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Cuba
0.0593 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0645 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
14th
Guatemala rank
12th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Cuba
  • Guatemala
0.020.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0645 kt per square kilometre against 0.0593 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0052 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 14th and Guatemala ranks 12th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1064 kt per square kilometre 0.0197 kt per square kilometre 0.0867 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0919 kt per square kilometre 0.0226 kt per square kilometre 0.0693 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0829 kt per square kilometre 0.0313 kt per square kilometre 0.0515 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0764 kt per square kilometre 0.0352 kt per square kilometre 0.0412 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.065 kt per square kilometre 0.0404 kt per square kilometre 0.0246 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0691 kt per square kilometre 0.0552 kt per square kilometre 0.0138 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0629 kt per square kilometre 0.0632 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0645 kt per square kilometre against 0.0593 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Guatemala?
0.0052 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Cuba ranks 14th and Guatemala ranks 12th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/">Cuba vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.