Cuba vs Malta: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square
Cuba
0.0593 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0622 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
14th
Malta rank
13th
Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time
- Cuba
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0622 kt per square kilometre against 0.0593 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0029 kt per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 14th and Malta ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1064 kt per square kilometre | 0.0288 kt per square kilometre | 0.0776 kt per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.0919 kt per square kilometre | 0.0345 kt per square kilometre | 0.0573 kt per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.0829 kt per square kilometre | 0.062 kt per square kilometre | 0.0209 kt per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.0764 kt per square kilometre | 0.0944 kt per square kilometre | 0.018 kt per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.065 kt per square kilometre | 0.0825 kt per square kilometre | 0.0175 kt per square kilometre | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.0691 kt per square kilometre | 0.063 kt per square kilometre | 0.0061 kt per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0629 kt per square kilometre | 0.0614 kt per square kilometre | 0.0015 kt per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.0622 kt per square kilometre against 0.0593 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Malta?
- 0.0029 kt per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
- Cuba ranks 14th and Malta ranks 13th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.