Cuba vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Cuba
0.0593 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0568 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
14th
Rwanda rank
15th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Cuba
  • Rwanda
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0593 kt per square kilometre against 0.0568 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0025 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 167 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1064 kt per square kilometre 0.0256 kt per square kilometre 0.0808 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0919 kt per square kilometre 0.0313 kt per square kilometre 0.0606 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0829 kt per square kilometre 0.025 kt per square kilometre 0.0578 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0764 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre 0.0557 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.065 kt per square kilometre 0.0391 kt per square kilometre 0.0258 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0691 kt per square kilometre 0.0484 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0629 kt per square kilometre 0.059 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Rwanda?
Cuba, at 0.0593 kt per square kilometre against 0.0568 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Rwanda?
0.0025 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Cuba ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/rwanda/">Cuba vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.