Czechia vs Malawi: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Czechia
0.0288 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.0276 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
53rd
Malawi rank
55th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Czechia
  • Malawi
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.0288 kt per square kilometre against 0.0276 kt per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0012 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 55th of 167 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 0.037 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0282 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0103 kt per square kilometre 0.0184 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0173 kt per square kilometre 0.0113 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 0.0287 kt per square kilometre 0.0261 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Czechia or Malawi?
Czechia, at 0.0288 kt per square kilometre against 0.0276 kt per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Czechia and Malawi?
0.0012 kt per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malawi?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Malawi rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Czechia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 55th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/czechia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/czechia/malawi/">Czechia vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.