Ecuador vs Nepal: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ecuador
0.0232 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.0242 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
62nd
Nepal rank
61st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Nepal
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0242 kt per square kilometre against 0.0232 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.001 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 61st of 167 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0116 kt per square kilometre 0.0342 kt per square kilometre 0.0226 kt per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.0141 kt per square kilometre 0.0379 kt per square kilometre 0.0238 kt per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.0216 kt per square kilometre 0.0375 kt per square kilometre 0.0159 kt per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.0303 kt per square kilometre 0.0373 kt per square kilometre 0.007 kt per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.0316 kt per square kilometre 0.0387 kt per square kilometre 0.0071 kt per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.0294 kt per square kilometre 0.0395 kt per square kilometre 0.0101 kt per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.0252 kt per square kilometre 0.0356 kt per square kilometre 0.0104 kt per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0242 kt per square kilometre against 0.0232 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Nepal?
0.001 kt per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/nepal/">Ecuador vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.