Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd
Mauritius rank
164th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mauritius
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Mauritius ranks 164th of 167 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.023 kt per square kilometre 0.0229 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0163 kt per square kilometre 0.0161 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0155 kt per square kilometre 0.0153 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.012 kt per square kilometre 0.0118 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Equatorial Guinea or Mauritius?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Mauritius ranks 164th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.