Eritrea vs Hungary: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Eritrea
0.0152 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
0.0146 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
77th
Hungary rank
79th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Eritrea
  • Hungary
0.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.0152 kt per square kilometre against 0.0146 kt per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Hungary ahead.

Eritrea ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 79th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Hungary in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0185 kt per square kilometre 0.0135 kt per square kilometre 0.005 kt per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 0.0169 kt per square kilometre 0.01 kt per square kilometre 0.007 kt per square kilometre Eritrea
2010s 0.015 kt per square kilometre 0.0128 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Eritrea
2020s 0.0151 kt per square kilometre 0.0153 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Eritrea or Hungary?
Eritrea, at 0.0152 kt per square kilometre against 0.0146 kt per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Eritrea and Hungary?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Hungary?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Hungary rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Eritrea ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 79th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Hungary: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/hungary/">Eritrea vs Hungary: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.