Estonia vs Peru: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Estonia
0.0081 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0077 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
107th
Peru rank
109th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Estonia
  • Peru
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0081 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 107th and Peru ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0124 kt per square kilometre 0.006 kt per square kilometre 0.0063 kt per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0071 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.008 kt per square kilometre 0.0073 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Estonia or Peru?
Estonia, at 0.0081 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Estonia and Peru?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Peru rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Estonia ranks 107th and Peru ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/peru/">Estonia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.