Ethiopia vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ethiopia
0.0704 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0645 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
10th
Guatemala rank
12th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Guatemala
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0704 kt per square kilometre against 0.0645 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0059 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guatemala ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 10th and Guatemala ranks 12th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0356 kt per square kilometre 0.0362 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0439 kt per square kilometre 0.0404 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre Ethiopia
2010s 0.0537 kt per square kilometre 0.0552 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0687 kt per square kilometre 0.0632 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ethiopia or Guatemala?
Ethiopia, at 0.0704 kt per square kilometre against 0.0645 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ethiopia and Guatemala?
0.0059 kt per square kilometre, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guatemala?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Guatemala rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ethiopia ranks 10th and Guatemala ranks 12th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/guatemala/">Ethiopia vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.