Ethiopia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ethiopia
0.0704 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0729 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
10th
Uganda rank
9th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Uganda
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.0729 kt per square kilometre against 0.0704 kt per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0025 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 9th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0356 kt per square kilometre 0.0263 kt per square kilometre 0.0093 kt per square kilometre Ethiopia
2000s 0.0439 kt per square kilometre 0.032 kt per square kilometre 0.0118 kt per square kilometre Ethiopia
2010s 0.0537 kt per square kilometre 0.0644 kt per square kilometre 0.0107 kt per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 0.0687 kt per square kilometre 0.072 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ethiopia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.0729 kt per square kilometre against 0.0704 kt per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ethiopia and Uganda?
0.0025 kt per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uganda?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Uganda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ethiopia ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 9th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/uganda/">Ethiopia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.