Faroe Islands vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Faroe Islands
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0014 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
149th
Tunisia rank
146th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Tunisia
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 149th and Tunisia ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0043 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Faroe Islands or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Faroe Islands and Tunisia?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Tunisia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Faroe Islands ranks 149th and Tunisia ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/tunisia/">Faroe Islands vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.