Finland vs Norway: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Finland
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
127th
Norway rank
128th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Finland
  • Norway
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 127th and Norway ranks 128th of 167 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0075 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0042 kt per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Finland or Norway?
Finland, at 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Finland and Norway?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Norway rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Finland ranks 127th and Norway ranks 128th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Norway: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/norway/">Finland vs Norway: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.