How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Palestine?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Palestine: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Finland

0.004 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Palestine

0.0041 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Finland rank

127th

Palestine rank

126th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Finland
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 127th and Palestine ranks 126th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0054 kt per square kilometre	0.0019 kt per square kilometre	0.0035 kt per square kilometre	Finland
2000s	0.0047 kt per square kilometre	0.0029 kt per square kilometre	0.0018 kt per square kilometre	Finland
2010s	0.0045 kt per square kilometre	0.0037 kt per square kilometre	0.0007 kt per square kilometre	Finland
2020s	0.0041 kt per square kilometre	0.0052 kt per square kilometre	0.001 kt per square kilometre	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Finland or Palestine?: Palestine, at 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Finland and Palestine?: 0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Palestine?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Finland and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Finland ranks 127th and Palestine ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/finland/west-bank-and-gaza/">Finland vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.