French Polynesia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

French Polynesia
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0058 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
119th
Sweden rank
118th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Sweden
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0058 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0074 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.0043 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0068 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), French Polynesia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0058 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between French Polynesia and Sweden?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
French Polynesia ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sweden/">French Polynesia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.