French Polynesia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

French Polynesia
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
119th
Turkmenistan rank
120th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Turkmenistan
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), French Polynesia or Turkmenistan?
French Polynesia, at 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between French Polynesia and Turkmenistan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
French Polynesia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/turkmenistan/">French Polynesia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.