Georgia vs Peru: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Georgia
0.0082 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0077 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
106th
Peru rank
109th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Georgia
  • Peru
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0082 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0005 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 106th and Peru ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0089 kt per square kilometre 0.006 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0071 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0097 kt per square kilometre 0.0073 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Georgia or Peru?
Georgia, at 0.0082 kt per square kilometre against 0.0077 kt per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Georgia and Peru?
0.0005 kt per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Peru rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Georgia ranks 106th and Peru ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/georgia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/georgia/peru/">Georgia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.