Ghana vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Ghana
0.0108 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
92nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
89th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Ghana
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0108 kt per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Ghana ranks 92nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0199 kt per square kilometre 0.0164 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0042 kt per square kilometre 0.0258 kt per square kilometre 0.0216 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0213 kt per square kilometre 0.0163 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ghana
2010s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0099 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0104 kt per square kilometre 0.011 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ghana or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0108 kt per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ghana ranks 92nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ghana/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ghana/trinidad-and-tobago/">Ghana vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.