Guatemala vs Malta: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Guatemala
0.0645 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0622 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
12th
Malta rank
13th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malta
0.020.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0645 kt per square kilometre against 0.0622 kt per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0023 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Guatemala ranks 12th and Malta ranks 13th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0197 kt per square kilometre 0.0288 kt per square kilometre 0.0091 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0226 kt per square kilometre 0.0345 kt per square kilometre 0.0119 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.0313 kt per square kilometre 0.062 kt per square kilometre 0.0307 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0352 kt per square kilometre 0.0944 kt per square kilometre 0.0592 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0404 kt per square kilometre 0.0825 kt per square kilometre 0.0421 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0552 kt per square kilometre 0.063 kt per square kilometre 0.0077 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0632 kt per square kilometre 0.0614 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Guatemala or Malta?
Guatemala, at 0.0645 kt per square kilometre against 0.0622 kt per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Guatemala and Malta?
0.0023 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malta rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Guatemala ranks 12th and Malta ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malta/">Guatemala vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.