Iraq vs Namibia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Iraq
0.0054 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0052 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
121st
Namibia rank
122nd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Iraq
  • Namibia
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.0054 kt per square kilometre against 0.0052 kt per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 122nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0042 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Iraq or Namibia?
Iraq, at 0.0054 kt per square kilometre against 0.0052 kt per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Iraq and Namibia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Namibia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Iraq ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 122nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iraq/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iraq/namibia/">Iraq vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.