Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Kazakhstan
0.0035 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0037 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
136th
Malaysia rank
133rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Malaysia
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0035 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 136th and Malaysia ranks 133rd of 167 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Kazakhstan or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0035 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Malaysia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Kazakhstan ranks 136th and Malaysia ranks 133rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/malaysia/">Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.