Latvia vs Togo: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Latvia
0.0088 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
0.0096 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
101st
Togo rank
98th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Latvia
  • Togo
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.0096 kt per square kilometre against 0.0088 kt per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0008 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 101st and Togo ranks 98th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.013 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0082 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Togo
2020s 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0096 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Latvia or Togo?
Togo, at 0.0096 kt per square kilometre against 0.0088 kt per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Latvia and Togo?
0.0008 kt per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Togo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Togo rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Latvia ranks 101st and Togo ranks 98th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Togo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/togo/">Latvia vs Togo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.