Lesotho vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Lesotho
0.0116 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
87th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
89th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Lesotho
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.0116 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Lesotho ranks 87th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0142 kt per square kilometre 0.0199 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0183 kt per square kilometre 0.0258 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0206 kt per square kilometre 0.0213 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.021 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0124 kt per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 0.0232 kt per square kilometre 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.017 kt per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 0.0166 kt per square kilometre 0.0099 kt per square kilometre 0.0067 kt per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.0118 kt per square kilometre 0.011 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Lesotho or Trinidad and Tobago?
Lesotho, at 0.0116 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Lesotho ranks 87th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/trinidad-and-tobago/">Lesotho vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.