Malta vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Malta
0.0622 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.0568 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
13th
Rwanda rank
15th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Malta
  • Rwanda
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0622 kt per square kilometre against 0.0568 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0054 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 167 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0288 kt per square kilometre 0.0256 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0345 kt per square kilometre 0.0313 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.062 kt per square kilometre 0.025 kt per square kilometre 0.037 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0944 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre 0.0737 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0825 kt per square kilometre 0.0391 kt per square kilometre 0.0434 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.063 kt per square kilometre 0.0484 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0614 kt per square kilometre 0.059 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Malta or Rwanda?
Malta, at 0.0622 kt per square kilometre against 0.0568 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Malta and Rwanda?
0.0054 kt per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Malta ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/rwanda/">Malta vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.