Mauritius vs Suriname: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Mauritius
0.0002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
164th
Suriname rank
161st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Suriname
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.7 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 161st of 167 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.023 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0226 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0163 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.016 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0155 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0148 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.012 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Mauritius or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0002 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Mauritius and Suriname?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Mauritius ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/suriname/">Mauritius vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.