Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Namibia
0.0052 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
122nd
Turkmenistan rank
120th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Namibia
  • Turkmenistan
0.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0052 kt per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 122nd and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0042 kt per square kilometre 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Namibia or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0055 kt per square kilometre against 0.0052 kt per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Namibia and Turkmenistan?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Namibia ranks 122nd and Turkmenistan ranks 120th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turkmenistan/">Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.