New Caledonia vs Serbia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

New Caledonia
0.0103 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0097 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
93rd
Serbia rank
96th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Serbia
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0103 kt per square kilometre against 0.0097 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Serbia ranks 96th of 167 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0115 kt per square kilometre 0.0123 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0112 kt per square kilometre 0.0114 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0104 kt per square kilometre 0.0111 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), New Caledonia or Serbia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0103 kt per square kilometre against 0.0097 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between New Caledonia and Serbia?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Serbia ranks 96th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/serbia/">New Caledonia vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.