New Caledonia vs Sierra Leone: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

New Caledonia
0.0103 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.0098 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
93rd
Sierra Leone rank
94th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Sierra Leone
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0103 kt per square kilometre against 0.0098 kt per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0005 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0098 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0149 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0104 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0152 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0103 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.013 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0092 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0112 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0104 kt per square kilometre 0.0098 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), New Caledonia or Sierra Leone?
New Caledonia, at 0.0103 kt per square kilometre against 0.0098 kt per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between New Caledonia and Sierra Leone?
0.0005 kt per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Sierra Leone rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Sierra Leone: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/sierra-leone/">New Caledonia vs Sierra Leone: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.