New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

New Caledonia
0.0103 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
93rd
South Sudan rank
90th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • New Caledonia
  • South Sudan
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0103 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0009 kt per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 93rd and South Sudan ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0111 kt per square kilometre 0.0095 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0104 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), New Caledonia or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0103 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between New Caledonia and South Sudan?
0.0009 kt per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and South Sudan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
New Caledonia ranks 93rd and South Sudan ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/south-sudan/">New Caledonia vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.