North Macedonia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

North Macedonia
0.0061 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0058 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
117th
Sweden rank
118th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sweden
0.0050.0070.010.0130.0150.018196119922023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.0061 kt per square kilometre against 0.0058 kt per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 117th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0163 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0094 kt per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0.0134 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 0.0106 kt per square kilometre 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0.0069 kt per square kilometre 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), North Macedonia or Sweden?
North Macedonia, at 0.0061 kt per square kilometre against 0.0058 kt per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between North Macedonia and Sweden?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sweden?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
North Macedonia ranks 117th and Sweden ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sweden/">North Macedonia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.