How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Palestine?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Norway vs Palestine: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Norway

0.004 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Palestine

0.0041 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway rank

128th

Palestine rank

126th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Norway
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 128th and Palestine ranks 126th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Norway	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0042 kt per square kilometre	0.0019 kt per square kilometre	0.0023 kt per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	0.004 kt per square kilometre	0.0029 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0.0038 kt per square kilometre	0.0037 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Norway
2020s	0.0041 kt per square kilometre	0.0052 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Norway or Palestine?: Palestine, at 0.0041 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Norway and Palestine?: 0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Palestine?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Norway and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Norway ranks 128th and Palestine ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/west-bank-and-gaza/">Norway vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.