How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Philippines vs Sudan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Philippines

0.0154 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0.0157 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Philippines rank

75th

Sudan rank

73rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Philippines
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.0157 kt per square kilometre against 0.0154 kt per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Philippines ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Philippines	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0151 kt per square kilometre	0.0156 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0154 kt per square kilometre	0.0158 kt per square kilometre	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Philippines or Sudan?: Sudan, at 0.0157 kt per square kilometre against 0.0154 kt per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Philippines and Sudan?: 0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Sudan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Philippines ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/philippines/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/philippines/sudan/">Philippines vs Sudan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.