South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

South Sudan
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0114 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
90th
Sri Lanka rank
88th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • South Sudan
  • Sri Lanka
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0114 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 167 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0095 kt per square kilometre 0.0115 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0113 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), South Sudan or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0114 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
South Sudan ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sri-lanka/">South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.