South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

South Sudan
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0112 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
90th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
89th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • South Sudan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

South Sudan ranks 90th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0095 kt per square kilometre 0.0103 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.011 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), South Sudan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0112 kt per square kilometre against 0.0112 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
South Sudan ranks 90th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 89th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/trinidad-and-tobago/">South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.