How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Sudan

0.0157 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0158 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan rank

73rd

Zimbabwe rank

70th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Sudan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0158 kt per square kilometre against 0.0157 kt per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sudan ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0156 kt per square kilometre	0.0151 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0158 kt per square kilometre	0.015 kt per square kilometre	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Sudan or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0158 kt per square kilometre against 0.0157 kt per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Sudan ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.