How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Rwanda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Afghanistan

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Rwanda

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Afghanistan rank

45th

Rwanda rank

46th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Afghanistan
Rwanda

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 166 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Afghanistan	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Afghanistan or Rwanda?: Afghanistan, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Afghanistan and Rwanda?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Rwanda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Afghanistan ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/afghanistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/afghanistan/rwanda/">Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.