How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Botswana?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Botswana: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belarus

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Botswana

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Belarus rank

50th

Botswana rank

53rd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Belarus
Botswana

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Botswana, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.

Belarus ranks 50th and Botswana ranks 53rd of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Botswana	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Botswana?: Belarus, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Botswana?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Botswana?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Botswana rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 50th and Botswana ranks 53rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Botswana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/botswana/">Belarus vs Botswana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.