Belarus vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belarus
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Guatemala
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belarus rank
50th
Guatemala rank
52nd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Belarus
  • Guatemala
00000196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 52nd of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Guatemala?
Belarus, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Guatemala?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 50th and Guatemala ranks 52nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/guatemala/">Belarus vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.