How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs China: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belgium

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

China

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Belgium rank

117th

China rank

119th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Belgium
China

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.

Belgium ranks 117th and China ranks 119th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	China	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or China?: Belgium, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and China?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and China rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belgium ranks 117th and China ranks 119th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs China: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/china/">Belgium vs China: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.