How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cuba?

51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Cuba: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Botswana

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cuba

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Botswana rank

53rd

Cuba rank

55th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Botswana
Cuba

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 53rd and Cuba ranks 55th of 166 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Cuba	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Botswana or Cuba?: Botswana, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Botswana and Cuba?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cuba?: 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Cuba rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Botswana ranks 53rd and Cuba ranks 55th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Cuba: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/cuba/">Botswana vs Cuba: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.